Demand Submission
Please leave us a message and we will contact you within 24 hours
Ni-C silicone shielding strip
Ag-Al silicone shielding strip
Silicone conductive strip
Silicone shielding strip
| Property | Ag/Al | Ag | Ni/C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume Resistivity (Ω·cm) | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.05 |
| Surface Resistance (Ω/inch) | <20 | <20 | <50 |
| Shielding Effectiveness (dB) | 130 | 130 | 110 |
| Shielding Rate | 99.9999% | 99.9999% | 99.999% |
| Tensile Strength (MPa) | 8.9 | 3.5 | 4.1 |
| Tear Strength (N/mm) | 39 | 16 | 15 |
| Elongation at Break (%) | 637 | 200 | 160 |
| Compression Set (100°C/168h) | 9.2% | 9.3% | 9.3% |
| Electrochemical Compatibility | ✅ Excellent (with Al housing) | ✅ Good | ✅ Good (with Al housing) |
| Salt Spray / Corrosion Resistance | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Good | ✅ Excellent |
| Flame Rating | UL94 HB | UL94 HB | UL94 HB |
| Cost | Medium | High | Low (1/4 of Ag series) |
| Test Standards | MIL-G-83528 · ASTM D412 | ||
Volume Resistivity: Lower values = higher conductivity. Ag: 0.002Ω·cm (lowest), Ag/Al: 0.004Ω·cm, Ni/C: 0.05Ω·cm.
Shielding Effectiveness: 130dB = 99.9999% attenuation · 110dB = 99.999% attenuation.
Tensile Strength: Ag/Al highest at 8.9MPa — ideal for demanding mechanical applications.
Electrochemical Compatibility: Ag/Al and Ni/C are compatible with aluminum housings — minimizing galvanic corrosion risk.
Test Standards: All products tested per MIL-G-83528 and ASTM D412. Full test reports available upon request.
| Comparison | Coating (Surface Treatment) | Compounding (Bulk Loading) |
|---|---|---|
| Principle | Conductive layer applied to silicone substrate surface | Conductive fillers blended into silicone matrix before extrusion |
| Conductive Layer Location | Surface only (surface conductive) | Throughout entire cross-section (bulk conductive) |
| Filler Loading | Conductive filler in coating layer only | ~40% filler + ~60% silicone |
| Max Coating / Conductive Thickness | ≤1mm | N/A (entire material is conductive) |
| Volume Resistivity | Higher (depends on coating quality and thickness) | Lower, more stable (uniform filler distribution) |
| Shielding Stability | May degrade with wear or coating delamination | Consistently stable — fillers uniformly distributed |
| Mechanical Properties | Substrate properties dominate (coating may crack) | Uniform performance throughout |
| Shielding Mechanism | Primarily reflection | Primarily absorption |
| Cost | Lower | Higher (more conductive material) |
| Best For | Standard industrial, cost-sensitive applications | Military, medical, 5G, high-end applications |
Volume Resistivity Comparison (Typical Values):
Ag/Al: Coating ~0.008Ω·cm → Compounding ~0.004Ω·cm
Ag: Coating ~0.005Ω·cm → Compounding ~0.002Ω·cm
Ni/C: Coating ~0.08Ω·cm → Compounding ~0.05Ω·cm
Bottom line: Compounding creates a denser, more continuous conductive network throughout the entire material — delivering significantly lower volume resistivity and more stable shielding performance than coating.
“Thank you Yutian for making the greatest and most dependable silicone products maker and supplier
with products that are incredibly strong, remarkably flexible, and simple to use.”
“The reliable silicone tube and nice services are offered by LegenDay, and we appreciate their help.
We also received our purchase quickly and of reliable quality.”
“I’m grateful for LegenDay assistance. LegenDay is a superb silicone tube goods manufacturer.
They helped me with the demands of my silicone tube company. The product has a lot of benefits.”
Related Products
